My last post got me thinking.
Why could a parent not challenge a student's suspension on the basis that the right to firearms is an individual right (in light of Heller), that there is ample evidence of teens as young as 16 being in the military, and the student had the parents' permission to have the firearms, and they were safely locked in the vehicle?
Just a thought ....
pm
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment