... does this make?
"What the law tries to do is create the best ratio possible between legitimate use of guns and illegitimate use."
So says Mark Graber, a professor at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law in Baltimore and admitted anti-gunner.
It seems that the best ratio between legitimate vs illegitimate would be Many:None. How does the "good and substantial reason" requirement help?
It doesn't.
pm
1 comment:
Applying the liberal mantra, I think establishing that better ratio should be an individual choice, made by an armed citizen at the point of dire need.
Post a Comment