Last week I was a juror in the trial of a man accused of selling a $10 bag of heroin to an undercover police officer. At the end of the two days of testimony, I concluded that the defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. I also concluded that he should be acquitted. In my mind, it came down to a simple, unsettling question: Is it worse to let a drug dealer go free, or to reward the police for lying under oath?
The case turned out almost perfectly; hung jury, and the prosecutor declined to refile charges.
And it's interesting that most judges these days won't let anyone even mention jury nullification; it's the best way to get out of the pool.
pm
No comments:
Post a Comment