I found this link at Ace of Spades, which kind of goes through the process of how to create a 'consensus':
Few people understand the real significance of Climategate, the now-famous hacking of emails from the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit (CRU). Most see the contents as demonstrating some arbitrary manipulating of various climate data sources in order to fit preconceived hypotheses (true), or as stonewalling and requesting colleagues to destroy emails to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in the face of potential or actual Freedom of Information requests (also true).
But there's something much, much worse going on—a silencing of climate scientists, akin to filtering what goes in the bible, that will have consequences for public policy, including the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) recent categorization of carbon dioxide as a "pollutant." - from first link in post
RTWT, including the links, but especially this one by Mr Michaels. In it he details how the East Anglia cabal simply didn't like to play fair, let alone scientifically.
I hope that politicians will realize that they've been duped (some willingly) .... alas, I;m not sure enough of them are that smart.
pm
No comments:
Post a Comment