... and interesting one to watch:
The
U.S. Supreme Court has been asked to review a Texas case and determine
whether when a homeowner exercises his Second Amendment rights he gives
up his Fourth Amendment rights.
In short, does the Second trump the Fourth?
The question is being presented by the Rutherford Institute on behalf of John Quinn of Texas.
Quinn’s home was the subject of a no-knock, SWAT-team style forceful entry and raid based “solely on the suspicion that there were legally owned firearms in the household,” the legal brief explains.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/supremes-asked-if-2nd-amendment-trumps-4th/#CK7u6w6TLpmZg4g3.99
The question is being presented by the Rutherford Institute on behalf of John Quinn of Texas.
Quinn’s home was the subject of a no-knock, SWAT-team style forceful entry and raid based “solely on the suspicion that there were legally owned firearms in the household,” the legal brief explains.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/supremes-asked-if-2nd-amendment-trumps-4th/#CK7u6w6TLpmZg4g3.99
The U.S. Supreme Court has been asked to review a Texas case and determine whether when a homeowner exercises his Second Amendment rights he gives up his Fourth Amendment rights.I don't see this one going very far, though it should go to SCOTUS and the conviction overturned.
In short, does the Second trump the Fourth?
The question is being presented by the Rutherford Institute on behalf of John Quinn of Texas.
How can a person be blamed for responding with deadly force when armed, organized invaders enter his home? John Quinn is lucky to be alive.
Unfortunately, and it pains me to say, this won't stop until some cops and judges start ending up dead.
pm
The
U.S. Supreme Court has been asked to review a Texas case and determine
whether when a homeowner exercises his Second Amendment rights he gives
up his Fourth Amendment rights.
In short, does the Second trump the Fourth?
The question is being presented by the Rutherford Institute on behalf of John Quinn of Texas.
Quinn’s home was the subject of a no-knock, SWAT-team style forceful entry and raid based “solely on the suspicion that there were legally owned firearms in the household,” the legal brief explains.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/supremes-asked-if-2nd-amendment-trumps-4th/#CK7u6w6TLpmZg4g3.99
The question is being presented by the Rutherford Institute on behalf of John Quinn of Texas.
Quinn’s home was the subject of a no-knock, SWAT-team style forceful entry and raid based “solely on the suspicion that there were legally owned firearms in the household,” the legal brief explains.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/supremes-asked-if-2nd-amendment-trumps-4th/#CK7u6w6TLpmZg4g3.99
The
U.S. Supreme Court has been asked to review a Texas case and determine
whether when a homeowner exercises his Second Amendment rights he gives
up his Fourth Amendment rights.
In short, does the Second trump the Fourth?
The question is being presented by the Rutherford Institute on behalf of John Quinn of Texas.
Quinn’s home was the subject of a no-knock, SWAT-team style forceful entry and raid based “solely on the suspicion that there were legally owned firearms in the household,” the legal brief explains.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/supremes-asked-if-2nd-amendment-trumps-4th/#dRSQ1uokDteXHrTH.99
The question is being presented by the Rutherford Institute on behalf of John Quinn of Texas.
Quinn’s home was the subject of a no-knock, SWAT-team style forceful entry and raid based “solely on the suspicion that there were legally owned firearms in the household,” the legal brief explains.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/supremes-asked-if-2nd-amendment-trumps-4th/#dRSQ1uokDteXHrTH.99
1 comment:
It should... will it??? Good question...
Post a Comment