Sounds like Mr Gura's got another notch coming.
Oral arguments in Ezell went badly for Chicago's attorney, especially when the one justice told him that his conceptualization of the injury was, well ... faulty would be charitable! It's also nice to hear that the two justices seem to think that the 2nd amendment should be held to intermediate scrutiny if not strict scrutiny, just like the 1st amendment.
Download the mp3 from Sebastian's link and enjoy the schadenfreude.
pm
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment